The Hindu Analysis
Video
Read Analysis
Headlines
-
A telco double dip attempt that threatens Net neutrality -
Page No.6, GS 3
-
Defection business - Page No.6, GS 2
-
More light, less sound - Page No.6, GS 2
-
India, Bhutan to discuss new routes of regional
connectivity - Page No.10 ‚ GS 2
-
Odd-even vehicle rotation scheme to return in Delhi - Page
No.12, GS 2
-
Chief Information Commissioner - Page No.12, GS 2
-
Text and Context - States in Court against their
Governors
A telco double dip attempt that threatens Net neutrality - Page No.6,
GS 3
- The attempt of telcos to double dip by charging both consumers and content
providers is not only avaricious but also undermines net neutrality, as stated
above.
- Net neutrality is the principle that Internet access providers must treat all
traffic originating from and terminating to the Internet in the same way.
- The idea has been developed over time, but its modern articulation may be
largely credited to Columbia Law School professor Tim Wu, who coined the term
"net neutrality" in a 2003 paper titled "Network Neutrality, Broadband
Discrimination."
- Here, Wu proposed the concept of net neutrality to promote playing field on the
Internet, ensuring that all data is treated equally without discrimination by
Internet service providers (ISPs).
- In July this year, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), at the
request of the government, invited a comprehensive consultation on the need and
possible mechanisms for regulation of Over-The-Top (OTT) services.
- For more than a decade now, telecom companies have seen revenue from traditional
streams such as voice calls and Short Message Service (SMS) come under pressure,
as competing OTT services are often free. At the same
time, they have had to invest heavily in upgrading their infrastructure to
handle increased data traffic, without necessarily seeing an equivalent rise in
revenue.
- It is also their lament that OTT services are not subject to the same level of
taxation and licensing fees, leading to an uneven playing field.
What is Telecom Regulatory Authority of India?
- The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was established with effect
from 20th February 1997 by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997.
Composition:
- TRAI consists of a chairperson and not more than two whole-time Members and not
more than two part-time Members.
Functions:
- To regulate telecom services, including fixation/revision of tariffs for telecom
services which were earlier vested in the Central Government
- Ensure quality of service and transparency in tariff
- Advise the government on policy matters and licensing issues
- The recommendations of the TRAl are not binding upon the Central Government.
Defection business - Page No.6, GS 2
Disqualification:
- A member of a House belonging to any political party becomes disqualified for
being a member of the House,
- if he voluntarily gives up his membership of such a political party; or
- if he votes or abstains from voting in such House contrary to any direction
issued by his political party without obtaining prior permission of such party
and such act has not been condoned by the party within 15 days.
Independent Members:
- An independent member of a House becomes disqualified from remaining a member
of the House if he joins any political party after such an election.
Nominated Members:
- A nominated member of a House becomes disqualified for being a member of the
House if he joins any political party after the expiry of six months from the
date he takes his seat in the House.
Deciding Authority:
- The Speaker of the House or the Chairman of the Legislative Council, as the
case may be, has the authority to decide on questions relating to defection, and
his or her decision is final and cannot be challenged in any
court.
Rule-Making Power:
- The presiding officer of a House is empowered to make rules to give effect to
the provisions of the Tenth Schedule. According to the rules made so, the
presiding officer can take up a defection case only when he receives
a complaint from a member of the House.
Role of Whip:
- The whip is responsible for communicating the party's position to its members
and ensuring they vote in line with that position. In the case of a member
defying the whip and voting against the party's official position,
they may be subiect to disciplinary action under the anti-defection law.
More light, less sound - Page No.6, GS 2
- In 2018, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research launched less noxious
and less noisy 'green' crackers, whose use various statutory bodies have
mandated.
- The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000 stipulate that
firecrackers cannot be burst in 'silence zones', designated by State
governments, and anywhere after 10 p.m. From 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. (i.e., 'daytime')
and in industrial areas, firecracker noise cannot exceed 75 dB(A) Leq.
- The thresholds in commercial and residential areas are 65 dB(A) Leq and 55 dB(A)
Leq, respectively. dB stands for decibel; A is a weight scale for human
perception of loudness.
- The rules allow people to register a complaint if the noise overshoots by 10
dB(A) Leq during daytime.
- Because dB is a logarithmic unit, an increase of 10 dB implies a tenfold
increase in acoustic pressure, which is often beyond the point at which the
sound becomes harmful.
- Research has found links between loud environs and sleep disorders, tinnitus,
stress, anxiety, hearing loss, and cardiac health.
- More than 80 dB(A) in offices has been associated with hypertension whereas
above 50 dB(A) at night, when the body is unaccustomed to loud noises, could
increase cortisol levels.
India, Bhutan to discuss new routes of regional connectivity - Page
No.10 ‚ GS 2
- King Jigme Khesar holds talks with PM; the two sides agree to go ahead with the
final survey for the 58-km crossborder rail link between Gelephu and Kokrajhar
in Assam; they will also explore a second rail link between
Bhutan and West Bengal
- Easing travel between the two countries, and allowing further exchanges to
Bangladesh is expected to help raise Bhutanese opportunities for trade and
travel, and bring in much-needed tourism revenues for the neighbouring
country.
Odd-even vehicle rotation scheme to return in Delhi - Page No.12, GS
2
- As air pollution in Delhi touched about 18 times the limit set by the World
Health Organization on Monday, Environment Minister Gopal Rai announced that the
government would implement an odd-even vehicle rotation scheme
in the city from November 13 to 20 to reduce air pollution.
- The odd-even scheme entails allowing vehicles whose registration number ends in
even digits to ply on even dates and those with odd digits to ply only on odd
dates.
- AQI is a number, which is a measure of air quality. The higher the AQI, the
worse the air.
- There are six categories of AQI, namely 'Good' (0-50), 'Satisfactory' (50-100),
'Moderately polluted' (100-200), Poor' (200-300), 'Very Poor' (300-400), and
'Severe' (400-500).
- It was launched by the central government in 2014 as part of the Swachh Bharat
campaign.
- According to the Central Pollution Control Board, part of the Ministry of
Environment, Forests and Climate Change, the AQI transforms complex air quality
data of various pollutants into a single number (index value),
nomenclature and colour.
- The pollutants measured include PM 10, PM 2.5, NO2, S02, CO, 03, NH3, and Pb.
- PM2.5, PM10, Ammonia, Lead, nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, ozone, and carbon
monoxide.
Chief Information Commissioner - Page No.12, GS 2
About Central Information Commission (CIC):
- Establishment: The CIC was established by the Central
Government in 2005, under the provisions of the Right to Information Act (2005).
It is not a constitutional body.
- Members: It consists of a Chief Information Commissioner and
not more than ten Information Commissioners.
- Appointment: They are appointed by the President on the
recommendation of a committee consisting of the Prime Minister as Chairperson,
the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a Union Cabinet
Minister nominated by the Prime Minister.
- Jurisdiction: The jurisdiction of the Commission extends
over all Central Public Authorities.
- Tenure: The Chief Information Commissioner and an Informa
Commissioner shall hold office for such term as prescribed by Central Government
or until they attain the age of 65 years, is earlier.
- They are not eligible for reappointment.
Text and Context - States in Court against their Governors
- Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Punjab have approached the Supreme Court to decide a
time-frame for which Governors have to either return or grant assent to Bills
passed by Legislatures. Some of these Bills have been sitting
with the Governors for years
- Article 200 of the Constitution covers the options before the Governor when a
Bill passed by both Houses of the Legislature is presented to him. The first
proviso to the Article says the Governor could either declare
his assent to the Bill or withhold the assent if it is not a Money Bill or
reserve the law for the consideration of the President if he thinks the Bill
derogates from or endangers the power of judicial review of
the High Court.
- Article 163 makes it clear the Governor is not expected to act independently.
The top court in the Shamsher Singh case verdict has held that as a formal head
of the State a "Governor exercises all his powers and functions
conferred on him by or under the Constitution on the aid and advice of his
Council of Ministers save in spheres where the Governor is required by or under
the Constitution to exercise his functions in his discretion."
- The 1988 Sarkaria Commission report on Centre-State relations had suggested
consultation with the Governor while drafting the Bill and fixing a deadline for
its disposal.
- Kerala has asked the Supreme Court to form a seven-judge Bench to review a
five-judge Bench judgment in the 1962 Purushothaman Nambudiri versus State of
Kerala case which held the view that Article 200 did not provide
"for a time limit within which the Governor.... should come to a decision on the
Bill referred to him for his assent".
- The State said that, at the time, the court did not consider the possibility of
Governors holding back Bills for an indefinite time.